THE 127th French Open will start on Sunday at Roland Garros in Paris, France. It's the only Grand Slam tennis tournament still decided on clay courts. What makes this surface different from grass or harder courts, and what style of playing works best on it?
Clay courts are not really made of clay, but usually from an aggregate of fine gravel and brick chips. This sub-layer is softer and bouncier than other surfaces, so it reduces the ball's speed each time it bounces, and at the same time makes it bounce higher. Clay courts also provide poorer traction, with the result that many of the best clay court players use a sliding style to get into position to play the return shot.
Clay courts are physically less demanding than harder courts because the softer sub-layer absorbs more of the impact on players' knees and ankles. On the other hand the slower play means that points and matches usually take longer to decide. Players also have more time to react and plan their return, which means that the placing of the ball and other strategic considerations become more important.
The slower gameplay and higher bounce also means that a player with a strong serve has less of an advantage than on other surfaces. The game also tends to take place further from the net and closer to the baseline. A consequence of the required style of playing is that some of the top tennis players could never win the French Open, including Pete Sampras, John McEnroe, Venus Williams and Virginia Wade. Others, like Rafael Nadal and Björn Borg, were equally good or even better on clay. – Willem Kempen
26 May 2023
Up to our knees in the stench of failure
Both the ANC and the DA must take their share of the blame for the Hammanskraal cholera crisis.
What have we done?
Cyril Ramaphosa's government is becoming party to a cynical regime of human rights abuses.
The ANC’s new credo: We put fokol
It's astonishing that leaders like Cyril Ramaphosa are just going on as if it's business as usual.
Should we fear a national coalition?
The possibility of a coalition after the 20244 elections fills many people with horror. Should it?
THE 127th French Open will start on Sunday at Roland Garros in Paris, France. It's the only Grand Slam tennis tournament still decided on clay courts. What makes this surface different from grass or harder courts, and what style of playing works best on it?
Clay courts are not really made of clay, but usually from an aggregate of fine gravel and brick chips. This sub-layer is softer and bouncier than other surfaces, so it reduces the ball's speed each time it bounces, and at the same time makes it bounce higher. Clay courts also provide poorer traction, with the result that many of the best clay court players use a sliding style to get into position to play the return shot.
Clay courts are physically less demanding than harder courts because the softer sub-layer absorbs more of the impact on players' knees and ankles. On the other hand the slower play means that points and matches usually take longer to decide. Players also have more time to react and plan their return, which means that the placing of the ball and other strategic considerations become more important.
The slower gameplay and higher bounce also means that a player with a strong serve has less of an advantage than on other surfaces. The game also tends to take place further from the net and closer to the baseline. A consequence of the required style of playing is that some of the top tennis players could never win the French Open, including Pete Sampras, John McEnroe, Venus Williams and Virginia Wade. Others, like Rafael Nadal and Björn Borg, were equally good or even better on clay. – Willem Kempen
FREE SPEECH
51 lessons about life, love and traffic circles
A group of friends distil their accumulated wisdom.
Space stations are here to stay
Wars are about people, not guns
Henry Kissinger: the American empire’s poker player
Is ‘brain food’ just a myth?
What science tells us about food and cognitive fitness.
A police station under lock and key
Ingrid Jones's fuck-you meter has finally hit red. Nobody takes responsibility and nobody is accountable.
Journalism that’s right and wrong at the same time
US Convocation: strife or hijacking?
Galaxy of country music lights up Lone Star state
BOOKS
In a world gone mad, crime fiction makes sense
Logical denouements and the triumph of justice make sense, but they only happen in fiction.
Janet Malcolm finally reveals herself
About the legacy of a remarkable journalist and record keeper.
RIP Martin Amis, and let’s embrace feelgood reads
I read André de Ruyter's Truth To Power and that's why I'm heading in a different direction this week.
LIFESTYLE
The man who broke the bank of Monte Carlo
Every family has an ‘Oom Boxer’.
Martha Stewart deliciously reinvents ageing
Martha Stewart blithely flipped the bird at preconceived ideas of growing old.
It’s risky, but I’m reading the Runes
Among all the ‘promising' tennis stars, which young man will reach the top?
FROM THE ARCHIVE
More than Botox, incontinence and dementia
The secret life of an introvert
The dog and the human: a love story